Shipping e-brief

15 Апр

Ежемесячный обзор от Ince & Co

Файл полностью



  • Commercial Court construes one trip time charter full article
  • To go or not to go? Boxship operators and owners face legal dilemma due to continued radiation threat
    in Japan full article
  • Consecutive voyage charter: commencement of the time bar period full article
  • Commercial Court interprets the meaning of “approved” by oil majors full article
  • The distinction between a “performance option” and a “contract option” under a time
    charterparty full article
  • Buyer entitled to refund of advance payments under shipbuilding contract: seller’s claim
    time-barred full article

    Litigation and Arbitration

  • Expert witness immunity full article
  • The Fiona Trust litigation and the Bribery Act 2010 full article
  • The Cross-Border Insolvency Regulations and their potential impact on charterparty disputes full articleCommercial
  • Court of Appeal upholds no set-off clause and time bar provision in BIFA standard trading
    conditions full article
  • Court of Appeal clarifies and restates test for repudiatory breach of contract full article
  • No breach of contract in relation to servicing of catamaran ferry engines full articleEconomic Sanctions
  • Sanctions against Libya – an update full articleProperty
  • London real estate market attractive to overseas investors full article
  • Reminder – Stamp Duty Land Tax (“SDLT”) Increase full articleOther News
  • Ince & Co Singapore launches Ince Law Alliance with newly-formed local law firm
    Incisive Law LLC full article
  • Ince & Co promotes nine new partners full article
  • Ince & Co appoints new asset finance partner in London full article